New York, August 24, 2025
The United States is witnessing a seismic shift in its financial technology sector, with regulatory resets, corporate retreats, and bold innovations reshaping the industry. Over the past week, Visa announced the closure of its open-banking unit, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) launched a major revision of consumer data-sharing rules, SoFi unveiled blockchain-based remittances, and Figure Technology revealed soaring revenues in its IPO filing. Together, these developments illustrate the tension between oversight and innovation, profitability and disruption, and local decisions with global consequences. For India, where fintech is one of the fastest-growing industries, the American experience offers both inspiration and caution.
Visa’s exit from U.S. open banking was perhaps the most telling development. Once considered a champion of digital finance, the payments giant concluded that America’s fragmented regulatory environment and ongoing battles between fintech firms and major banks made the market unworkable. According to reports, leading institutions such as JPMorgan Chase had begun charging high fees for fintechs to access customer banking data, effectively creating new barriers to entry. Visa’s retreat highlights a fundamental problem: without clear, enforceable rules, even the largest players cannot build sustainable products in an environment dominated by conflicting interests.
In parallel, the CFPB has moved to address these concerns by rewriting the Biden-era open-banking regulations. Initially framed under the Dodd-Frank Act as a way to give consumers control over their financial data, the rules had stalled amid disputes between banks and technology companies. Director Rohit Chopra has signaled a more aggressive approach, promising a system where consumers can securely share data with authorized third parties without prohibitive costs. Critics argue that the revisions could still leave loopholes for incumbents, while supporters see a long-overdue step toward a modern financial architecture. Whatever the outcome, the clash over data rights is set to define the next decade of U.S. fintech.
While Visa steps back, SoFi is stepping boldly forward. The online lender and investing platform announced it will roll out a blockchain-powered remittance service in partnership with Lightspark. Beginning later this year in Mexico, the system will allow users to send U.S. dollars, convert them to Bitcoin, transfer funds across borders, and instantly convert them into local currency. SoFi’s chief executive Anthony Noto has described the initiative as “just the beginning” of a broader strategy that includes stablecoins, staking services, and AI-enabled lending. The company’s move into crypto payments is striking because it comes at a time when many financial institutions remain cautious about digital assets. Yet SoFi argues that blockchain provides faster, cheaper, and more transparent solutions to problems that traditional banks have failed to solve.


Remittances are a critical testing ground for this strategy. Globally, cross-border money transfers are worth more than $860 billion annually, with India alone receiving over $125 billion in 2024. Current systems often rely on intermediaries, leading to delays and high transaction costs. By leveraging blockchain rails, SoFi hopes to undercut incumbents such as Western Union while offering a new standard of speed and efficiency. For Indian policymakers and fintech entrepreneurs, the experiment is especially relevant: if blockchain remittances succeed in the U.S.–Mexico corridor, similar models could transform flows into South Asia, the Middle East, and Africa.
At the same time, Figure Technology is proving that fintech innovation can be profitable. The San Francisco-based firm, founded by former SoFi CEO Mike Cagney, has built a blockchain platform for capital markets, including products that tokenize home equity and other financial assets. In its filing for a Nasdaq listing under the ticker FIGR, the company disclosed $191 million in revenue for the first half of 2025, a 22 percent increase from the previous year, and a net profit of $29 million, compared with a $13 million loss in the same period of 2024. These numbers challenge the perception that fintech firms must sacrifice profitability to pursue scale. Instead, Figure demonstrates how tokenization can drive both efficiency and investor confidence.
The Federal Reserve has also played a role in this changing landscape. Earlier this month, it announced it would phase out its special oversight program for “novel activities” in banking, which had monitored involvement in crypto and fintech projects. Instead, such activities will now be handled by mainstream supervisory frameworks. The decision reflects a growing recognition that fintech and digital assets are no longer fringe experiments but part of the financial mainstream. By normalizing oversight, the Fed may provide banks with greater confidence to engage in innovation, although critics warn that it could dilute scrutiny at a time when systemic risks are still emerging.
The combination of regulatory recalibration, corporate strategy, and technological experimentation has created a moment of flux in U.S. fintech. For every retreat like Visa’s, there is an advance like SoFi’s or Figure’s. For every legal challenge — such as the recent guilty plea by Aspiration Partners’ co-founder Joseph Sanberg in a $248 million fraud case — there is evidence of institutional maturity as profitable firms prepare to go public. These contradictions reveal an ecosystem in transition, testing the balance between consumer protection, market access, and global competitiveness.
For Indian readers, the implications are significant. India’s fintech story is often celebrated as one of speed, scale, and inclusion, built on platforms such as UPI, Aadhaar, and the Account Aggregator framework. Yet the American experience shows that technological potential alone is not enough. Regulatory clarity, data rights, and investor confidence are equally essential. Visa’s withdrawal highlights the risks of fragmented policymaking, while SoFi’s blockchain venture illustrates the opportunities of bold innovation. Figure’s financial turnaround, meanwhile, provides a blueprint for profitability in an industry often criticized for chasing growth at any cost.
India is uniquely positioned to learn from these developments. Its remittance corridors, its appetite for digital payments, and its global diaspora all create fertile ground for blockchain-enabled services. At the same time, policymakers must ensure that new rules are not captured by incumbents or stifled by uncertainty. If U.S. fintech is a story of conflict between regulators, banks, and startups, India can aim to build a model of collaboration. The lesson is clear: innovation thrives when policy frameworks are both clear and forward-looking.
Ultimately, the United States remains a laboratory for fintech evolution. The next few months will determine whether the CFPB’s new rules deliver true open banking, whether SoFi’s blockchain experiment gains traction, and whether Figure’s IPO ignites investor confidence in tokenized finance. The outcomes will not only shape America’s financial future but also influence strategies in emerging markets like India. In a world where capital, technology, and talent move seamlessly across borders, no country can afford to ignore the signals.
As U.S. fintech recalibrates, the message for India is twofold. First, build systems that protect consumers while enabling innovation. Second, embrace technologies such as blockchain not as speculative gambits but as tools to solve real-world problems like remittance costs and financial inclusion. The American experience, unfolding in real time, is both a warning and a roadmap.
– By NewsNowNation Editorial Team