Bombay High court: ‘Women can’t be asked to chose between career and child’

A family court ruling that prohibited the mother from moving to Poland with her daughter was overturned on Wednesday by the Bombay High Court, which remarked that a woman “cannot be compelled to choose between her child and her work.”

A petition from the mother asking for permission to move to Krakow, Poland with her nine-year-old daughter was being heard by a single-judge bench presided over by Justice Bharti Dangre. The woman, who is employed by a private company in Pune, had received an offer from her employer for a project in Poland.

The husband had objected to the request, saying that he would never get to see the child again if she was relocated away from him. The man said that the woman’s sole motivation for moving to Poland was to sever the father-daughter relationship. The lawyers even brought up Poland’s continuing conflict with its neighbours, Russia and Ukraine.

Although the court stated that “there has never been, and there will never be, anything quite as precious as the love between a daughter and her father,” Justice Bharti Dangre emphasised that no court can deny a woman’s career opportunities.

However, the mother was ordered by the court to provide her daughter’s father both physical and virtual access to her. Every vacation, the woman will have to return to India so that the father can meet their daughter.

After hearing both sides’ arguments, Justice Dangre noted that the mother, who had raised the daughter solely, had custody of her up until this point. Given the girl’s age, it is crucial that she continue to live with her mother.

The judge made the decision to achieve a balance between the woman’s job aspirations and her relationship with her father. The judge stated, “A mother who is willing to work cannot be denied the chance to do so, in my opinion, and the court cannot deny her employment opportunities. It is necessary to strike a balance between the interests of the mother and father while also taking the child’s welfare into consideration.”

The court also rejected the husband’s argument that the kid would experience anxiety if she were to be uprooted and moved to a different nation right away. “Children frequently move with their parents when they do. Due to her obligations, it is also very uncommon for working women to leave their children in daycare centres “explained Justice Dangre.

The woman might take her mother with her to Poland for assistance, and the court had also highlighted that the child’s exposure and horizons would be expanded by the international travel.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Latest

Arambam: Rakul Preet’s Nutrient-Rich Haven in Hyderabad

Arambam, the newest addition to Hyderabad’s culinary scene, where millets take center stage in a celebration of health and flavor. Rakul Preet Singh, the Bollywood actress, invites you on a gastronomic journey that combines ancient grains with modern culinary delights. Millets have gained widespread recognition as a superfood, thanks to their nutritional richness. From pearl […]

Read More
Latest

Supreme Court Imposes Rs 5 Lakh Cost on Wife’s Father for Filing False Cases to Harass Husband

  The recent ruling by the Supreme Court imposing a cost of Rs 5 lakhs on a wife’s father for lodging false Section 498A IPC cases against the husband at different places to harass him is a significant development in the realm of legal justice. This decision sheds light on the misuse of legal mechanisms […]

Read More
Latest

The Meteoric Rise of Minimalist: Building an INR 100 Cr Business in Eight Months

  In the ever-evolving landscape of the beauty and personal care industry, the emergence of direct-to-consumer (D2C) brands has been nothing short of revolutionary. Among these trailblazers stands Minimalist, a Jaipur-based startup founded by siblings Mohit and Rahul Yadav, which has swiftly climbed the ladder to achieve an impressive INR 100 Cr revenue mark within […]

Read More